Decision
the Committee, the State party reiterates that it is not necessary to establish a mechanism for the judicial review of the public prosecutor’s decrees on the age of majority, given that the issue is already addressed in the law. It refers to decision No. 680/2020 of 5 June 2020 of the Supreme Court, wherein the Court states that the decrees are “sufficiently relevant for us to have no doubt as to the appealable nature of that decree”. In relation to subparagraph (d) of the remedy requested by the Committee, the State party refers to several training sessions and capacity building exercises conducted between 2020 and 2021 involving judicial, security and medical actors. Among them, the State party mentions the Judicial School, with members of the judicial and prosecutorial careers; the Centre of Legal Studies, with members being those tasked with the administration of justice; the Body of Forensic Doctors; the judicial police; the national police; and the Civil Guard. M.B.S. v. Spain (CRC/C/85/D/26/2017) M.B. v. Spain (CRC/C/85/D/28/2017) B.G. v. Spain, communication No. 38/2017 (see L.D. and B.G. v Spain (CRC/C/85/D/37/2017-