The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin on the enjoyment of human rights, and the importance of improving international cooperation
A/HRC/RES/31/22 · 2016-03-24 · Human Rights Council
- Symbol
- A/HRC/RES/31/22
- Date
- 2016-03-24
- Body
- Human Rights Council
- Outcome
- Adopted by recorded vote: 32 Yes, 0 No, 15 abstentions
- Subject
- CRIMINAL ASSETS - ILLICIT FUNDS TRANSFER - REPATRIATION
- Agenda item
- Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development
Sources: OHCHR record · Adopted text · Draft
Yes (32)
AlgeriaBangladeshBoliviaBotswanaBurundiChinaCongoCubaCôte d'IvoireEcuadorEl SalvadorEthiopiaGhanaIndiaIndonesiaKenyaKyrgyzstanMaldivesMongoliaMoroccoNamibiaNigeriaParaguayPhilippinesQatarRussian FederationSaudi ArabiaSouth AfricaTogoUnited Arab EmiratesVenezuelaViet NamNo (0)
noneAbsent or not participating (0)
noneNeighbouring votes on the same subject
- 2013 · A/HRC/RES/22/12 The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of
- 2014 · A/HRC/RES/25/9 The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of
- 2015 · A/HRC/RES/28/5 The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of
- 2017 · A/HRC/RES/34/11 The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of
- 2019 · A/HRC/RES/40/4 The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of
- 2023 · A/HRC/RES/52/21 The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of